Researches, develops, produces, distributes, and sells nanotechnology products. Specializes in proprietary silicon-based microprocessors for EMR protection. Now — the numbers.
The company is still in the product-building phase: its spending runs above its sales. That only changes once the product starts selling at scale.
Average growth of 67% a year over the last 4 years. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
Before the clock runs out, either sales must climb sharply or new money must come in. This is the most critical line in the whole picture.
This company is not turning a profit, so the market is pricing its sales instead: 0.2× for every dollar of annual revenue.
No analyst target is on record for this company.
angles, checked one by one.
The 2 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
Cost Efficiency: As sales grow, profit fails to keep the same pace.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 98% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
Over the last 4 years, sales grew about 67% a year on average.
Sales run at $13.0M a year. A small number, but proof the product has real buyers.
A loss of $6.1M against $13.0M in annual sales.
The stock sits at $0.03. Under exchange rules, stocks that stay below $1 for too long risk being removed from the market.
At the current pace of spending, the cash lasts less than a year. After that, the company needs to find new money.
No score published: this stock trades under $10,000 on a typical day, so the price beside it is not one you could reliably act on.
One-line summary: few numbers, an untested story. Keep watching.
Not covered, because the filings we hold do not carry it: earnings execution, the revenue breakdown.