Procures whisky from various distilleries and suppliers. Distributes whisky products to retailers and wholesalers in Taiwan and international markets. Now — the numbers.
This is an established company with proven profits.
The gap is $85K. In times of high interest rates, a gap like that can squeeze a company.
The market pays 400.6× for every dollar this company earns in a year — a price that already assumes things go well.
Against companies in its own sector, it looks cheaper than 13% of them.
No analyst target is on record for this company.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Profit power and business quality lead the class.
A solid grade overall — yet the debt outweighs the cash. The strength here comes from earnings power.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Valuation: The stock trades at a price that looks expensive next to its earnings; that can cap future returns.
Price Momentum: The stock has lagged the market in recent months; investor interest is weak right now.
angles, checked one by one.
The 2 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
The stock trades 43% below its peak. The market has trimmed its expectations for the company.
The net profit margin is 31% — still a thick cushion, though costs have been eating into it lately.
Over the last 1 years, sales grew about 186% a year on average.
The company’s market value is 401 times its annual profit. Even a small disappointment could hit the price hard.
Today’s price already includes part of tomorrow’s optimism. Report-card grade: 13/100.
Buyers haven’t stepped back in yet; the price hasn’t found its footing. Report-card grade: 24/100. For a turnaround signal, the stock first needs to close the gap with the market.
On our five-subject report card, AGCC sits in the middle of the class: some subjects shine, others don’t. The grade moves as the numbers move.
The takeaway: AGCC is an established business that has proven its profits for years. The real debate isn’t the quality of the business — it’s whether the price paid for the stock is too high.
Not covered, because the filings we hold do not carry it: the growth trend, earnings execution, the revenue breakdown.