Design and manufacture electronic warfare systems, navigation systems, and electro-optical sensors. Now — the numbers.
This is an established company with proven profits.
Average growth of 10% a year over the last 4 years. Every year shown ended in profit.
The gap is $7.4B. In times of high interest rates, a gap like that can squeeze a company.
The market pays 27× for every dollar of annual profit — around what a business like this usually costs.
Analysts' average target sits 10% above today's price.
angles, checked one by one.
The 3 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
Trading Liquidity: The shares change hands too rarely for smooth trading.
The stock trades 17% below its peak. The market has trimmed its expectations for the company.
Over the last 4 years, sales grew about 10% a year on average.
It met or beat analyst expectations in 7 of the last 8 quarters — consistency is a promise kept.
It pays out $1.94 per share each year — regular cash for whoever holds the stock.
Getting in and out without moving the price could prove difficult. Council score: 2/10.
As the slice kept from each sale thins out, so does the profit. Council score: 3/10.
Since the drop from its peak, buyer appetite hasn’t come back. Council score: 3/10.
We don’t have a report card for this stock yet — the data isn’t mature enough to grade. No grade is information too: it means the evidence is thin.
One-line summary: few numbers, an untested story. Keep watching.
Not covered, because the filings we hold do not carry it: the revenue breakdown.