Collects, transports, sorts, and distributes addressed and non-addressed mail, printed documents, and newspapers. Now — the numbers.
The company closed last year at a loss: costs ran above sales. The picture changes only if spending is reined in.
No real growth (1% a year). Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
At this burn rate the cash pile isn’t the pressing question — for now, time is on the company’s side.
angles, checked one by one.
The 2 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
Profit per Sale: The profit kept from each sale is thin.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 87% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
The company sells $5.2B a year; the problem isn’t sales — it’s costs running above that number.
A loss of $46.6M against $5.2B in annual sales.
Since the drop from its peak, buyer appetite hasn’t come back. Council score: 0/10.
As the slice kept from each sale thins out, so does the profit. Council score: 3/10.
No score published: this stock trades under $10,000 on a typical day, so the price beside it is not one you could reliably act on.
One-line summary: few numbers, an untested story. Keep watching.
Not covered, because the filings we hold do not carry it: the revenue breakdown.