Design, engineer, and manufacture aerostructures and aircraft components. Provide aircraft modifications, including upgrades for military and commercial applications. Now — the numbers.
This is an established company with proven profits.
Average growth of 7% a year over the last 4 years. Every year shown ended in profit.
The market pays 12.4× for every dollar of annual profit — cheap, which is either an opportunity or a warning.
No analyst target is on record for this company.
Executives buying with their own money is usually read as confidence in the company’s future.
angles, checked one by one.
The 3 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
R&D Investment: Spending on future research is low.
The stock trades below its recent peak — about 14% off the top. A pullback, not a collapse.
The net profit margin is 22% — still a thick cushion, though costs have been eating into it lately.
Over the last 12 months, company executives reported 32 buys and 8 sells. Management buying with its own money is usually read as a good sign.
The share set aside for the future is small; the pace of new ideas may slow. Council score: 2/10.
Getting in and out without moving the price could prove difficult. Council score: 2/10.
Against everything we grade, BUKS lands somewhere in the middle. The grade moves as the numbers move.
The takeaway: BUKS is an established business that has proven its profits for years. The real debate isn’t the quality of the business — it’s whether the price paid for the stock is too high.
Not covered, because the filings we hold do not carry it: earnings execution, the revenue breakdown.