Provide IT infrastructure setup and integration for e-commerce platforms. Design and set up online stores for brand partners. Now — the numbers.
That much dependence is a risk in itself: if this one line weakens, the whole company feels it directly.
The company closed last year at a loss: costs ran above sales. The picture changes only if spending is reined in.
At this burn rate the cash pile isn’t the pressing question — for now, time is on the company’s side.
This company is not turning a profit, so the market is pricing its sales instead: 0.1× for every dollar of annual revenue.
Against companies in its own sector, it looks cheaper than 86% of them.
Analysts' average target sits 39% above today's price.
Executives buying with their own money is usually read as confidence in the company’s future.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 87% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
The company sells $1.5B a year; the problem isn’t sales — it’s costs running above that number.
There is $417.6M in the vault; even if every debt were paid off, $78.1M would remain.
Over the last 12 months, company executives reported 49 buys and 2 sells. Management buying with its own money is usually read as a good sign.
A loss of $36.1M against $1.5B in annual sales.
Since the drop from its peak, buyer appetite hasn’t come back.
On our five-subject report card, BZUN sits behind the class. A low grade doesn’t mean “doomed” — it means “big claim, small proof.”
The takeaway: BZUN has solid sales but closed last year at a loss. The road back to profit runs through spending discipline.
The total grade weighs these five subjects against the sector — it isn’t a simple average of the five.