Own and operate temperature-controlled warehouses. Provide storage solutions for perishable goods. Now — the numbers.
The biggest line carries real weight, but it doesn’t decide everything on its own.
The company closed last year at a loss: costs ran above sales. The picture changes only if spending is reined in.
Before the clock runs out, either sales must climb sharply or new money must come in. This is the most critical line in the whole picture.
This company is not turning a profit, so the market is pricing its sales instead: 1.6× for every dollar of annual revenue.
Against companies in its own sector, it looks cheaper than 26% of them.
Analysts' average target sits 10% above today's price.
Executives buying with their own money is usually read as confidence in the company’s future.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
The price is looking for direction — no strong breakout, no collapse.
Financial Strength: The cash-and-debt balance is thin; the buffer for hard times is slim.
Growth: Sales growth trails the sector average.
The stock trades 57% below its peak. The market has trimmed its expectations for the company.
Over the last 12 months, company executives reported 41 buys and 10 sells. Management buying with its own money is usually read as a good sign.
It pays out $0.92 per share each year — regular cash for whoever holds the stock.
A loss of $114.5M against $2.6B in annual sales. And on top of that, sales fell from the year before.
At the current pace of spending, the cash lasts about 1.2 years. After that, the company needs to find new money.
We grade companies — revenue, margins, balance sheets. This is a fund, so there is no report card to give. That is not a low grade; it is a different kind of thing.
One-line summary: a basket, not a business. Judge it by what it holds.