Connects customers with restaurants through an online platform. Provides food delivery services in approximately 50 countries. Now — the numbers.
The company closed last year at a loss: costs ran above sales. The picture changes only if spending is reined in.
Average growth of 24% a year over the last 4 years. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
At this burn rate the cash pile isn’t the pressing question — for now, time is on the company’s side.
This company is not turning a profit, so the market is pricing its sales instead: 0.8× for every dollar of annual revenue.
No analyst target is on record for this company.
angles, checked one by one.
The 3 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
R&D Investment: Spending on future research is low.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 71% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
Over the last 4 years, sales grew about 24% a year on average.
The company sells $16.3B a year; the problem isn’t sales — it’s costs running above that number.
A loss of $908.0M against $16.3B in annual sales.
Since the drop from its peak, buyer appetite hasn’t come back. Council score: 0/10.
The share set aside for the future is small; the pace of new ideas may slow. Council score: 2/10.
We don’t have a report card for this stock yet — the data isn’t mature enough to grade. No grade is information too: it means the evidence is thin.
One-line summary: few numbers, an untested story. Keep watching.
Not covered, because the filings we hold do not carry it: the revenue breakdown.