Develop and operate themed entertainment resorts and theme parks. Provide master planning services for themed entertainment projects. Now — the numbers.
This is an established company with proven profits.
Average growth of 25% a year over the last 4 years. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
The gap is $16.1M. In times of high interest rates, a gap like that can squeeze a company.
The market pays 89.5× for every dollar this company earns in a year — a price that already assumes things go well.
Against companies in its own sector, it looks cheaper than 18% of them.
No analyst target is on record for this company.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Clearly below the class average.
A solid grade overall — yet the debt outweighs the cash. The strength here comes from earnings power.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
The price is looking for direction — no strong breakout, no collapse.
Valuation: The stock trades at a price that looks expensive next to its earnings; that can cap future returns.
Business Quality: Profit power and business quality trail similar companies in the sector.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 70% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
The net profit margin is 23% — still a thick cushion, though costs have been eating into it lately.
The company’s market value is 89 times its annual profit. Even a small disappointment could hit the price hard.
Over the last 12 months, executives reported 21 sells against just 6 buys. Not an alarm bell by itself, but a number worth watching.
We don’t have a report card for this stock yet — the data isn’t mature enough to grade. No grade is information too: it means the evidence is thin.
One-line summary: few numbers, an untested story. Keep watching.
Not covered, because the filings we hold do not carry it: earnings execution, the revenue breakdown.