Researches and develops flavors and fragrances. Produces flavors and fragrances. Now — the numbers.
The company closed last year at a loss: costs ran above sales. The picture changes only if spending is reined in.
No real growth (-3% a year). Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
At this burn rate the cash pile isn’t the pressing question — for now, time is on the company’s side.
This company is not turning a profit, so the market is pricing its sales instead: 3.1× for every dollar of annual revenue.
No analyst target is on record for this company.
angles, checked one by one.
The 5 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
Trading Liquidity: The shares change hands too rarely for smooth trading.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 80% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
The company sells $520.3M a year; the problem isn’t sales — it’s costs running above that number.
There is $946.5M in the vault; even if every debt were paid off, $919.7M would remain.
It pays out $0.95 per share each year — regular cash for whoever holds the stock.
A loss of $56.5M against $520.3M in annual sales.
Getting in and out without moving the price could prove difficult. Council score: 2/10.
Since the drop from its peak, buyer appetite hasn’t come back. Council score: 3/10.
No score published: this stock trades under $10,000 on a typical day, so the price beside it is not one you could reliably act on.
One-line summary: few numbers, an untested story. Keep watching.
Not covered, because the filings we hold do not carry it: earnings execution, the revenue breakdown.