Operates an online food delivery marketplace. Connects consumers with a wide range of restaurants. Now — the numbers.
The company closed last year at a loss: costs ran above sales. The picture changes only if spending is reined in.
Average growth of 15% a year over the last 4 years. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
Before the clock runs out, either sales must climb sharply or new money must come in. This is the most critical line in the whole picture.
This company is not turning a profit, so the market is pricing its sales instead: 1× for every dollar of annual revenue.
No analyst target is on record for this company.
angles, checked one by one.
The 2 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
Cost Efficiency: As sales grow, profit fails to keep the same pace.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 74% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
Over the last 4 years, sales grew about 15% a year on average.
A loss of $1.9B against $4.1B in annual sales. And on top of that, sales fell from the year before.
At the current pace of spending, the cash lasts less than a year. After that, the company needs to find new money.
Against everything we grade, JTKWY lands near the bottom. A low grade doesn’t mean “doomed” — it means “big claim, small proof.”
The takeaway: JTKWY has solid sales but closed last year at a loss. The road back to profit runs through spending discipline.
Not covered, because the filings we hold do not carry it: earnings execution, the revenue breakdown.