Provide engineering and consulting services for building systems. Design HVAC and MEP systems for commercial and industrial buildings. Now — the numbers.
That much dependence is a risk in itself: if this one line weakens, the whole company feels it directly.
The company closed last year at a loss: costs ran above sales. The picture changes only if spending is reined in.
Average growth of 27% a year over the last 3 years. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
At this burn rate the cash pile isn’t the pressing question — for now, time is on the company’s side.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly above the class average — a step short of the very top.
Clearly below the class average.
Financial Strength: The cash-and-debt balance is thin; the buffer for hard times is slim.
Valuation: The stock trades at a price that looks expensive next to its earnings; that can cap future returns.
The stock trades 45% below its peak. The market has trimmed its expectations for the company.
Over the last 3 years, sales grew about 27% a year on average.
The company sells $2.6B a year; the problem isn’t sales — it’s costs running above that number.
A loss of $59.8M against $2.6B in annual sales.
This stock swings about 3.1 times as much as the market average. Big rallies — and big drops — can both happen fast.
On our five-subject report card, LGN sits behind the class. A low grade doesn’t mean “doomed” — it means “big claim, small proof.”
The takeaway: LGN has solid sales but closed last year at a loss. The road back to profit runs through spending discipline.
The total grade weighs these five subjects against the sector — it isn’t a simple average of the five.
Analysts’ average target sits above today’s price, yet the valuation grade (35/100) says the stock isn’t cheap.