On the stock market since 2006, it operates in the world of technology. It has 337 employees. Now — the numbers.
This is an established company with proven profits.
That much dependence is a risk in itself: if this one line weakens, the whole company feels it directly.
Average growth of 26% a year over the last 4 years. Every year shown ended in profit.
The gap is $22.3M. In times of high interest rates, a gap like that can squeeze a company.
angles, checked one by one.
The 3 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
Bets Against the Stock: The number of investors betting on a fall stands out.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 90% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
Over the last 3 years, sales grew about 16% a year on average.
Over the last 12 months, company executives reported 51 buys and 14 sells. Management buying with its own money is usually read as a good sign.
The average analyst price target is $10.00 — 706% above today’s price.
Since the drop from its peak, buyer appetite hasn’t come back. Council score: 0/10.
The weight of investors positioned for a fall can be felt in the market. Council score: 2/10.
On our five-subject report card, LUNA sits in the middle of the class: some subjects shine, others don’t. The grade moves as the numbers move.
The takeaway: LUNA is an established business that has proven its profits for years. The real debate isn’t the quality of the business — it’s whether the price paid for the stock is too high.