On the stock market since 2020, it operates in the world of media and communication. It has 147 employees. Now — the numbers.
This is an established company with proven profits.
That much dependence is a risk in itself: if this one line weakens, the whole company feels it directly.
Average growth of 15% a year over the last 4 years. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Clearly below the class average.
A solid grade overall — yet the debt outweighs the cash. The strength here comes from earnings power.
The price isn’t cheap next to earnings — that’s why this grade sits in the middle.
Sales are growing strongly for its sector.
The stock has been running stronger than the market lately.
Business Quality: Profit power and business quality trail similar companies in the sector.
angles, checked one by one.
The 3 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
Profit per Sale: The profit kept from each sale is thin.
The stock trades 57% below its peak. The market has trimmed its expectations for the company.
Over the last 3 years, sales grew about 34% a year on average.
It pays out $5.70 per share each year — regular cash for whoever holds the stock.
Over the last 12 months, executives reported 282 sells against just 40 buys. Not an alarm bell by itself, but a number worth watching.
The stock trades 22% above the average analyst price target.
On our five-subject report card, MAX sits in the middle of the class: some subjects shine, others don’t. The grade moves as the numbers move.
The takeaway: MAX is an established business that has proven its profits for years. The real debate isn’t the quality of the business — it’s what that quality should cost.