On the stock market since 2021, it operates in the world of technology. It has 25 employees. Now — the numbers.
The company is still in the product-building phase: its spending runs above its sales. That only changes once the product starts selling at scale.
Average growth of 26% a year over the last 4 years. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
Before the clock runs out, either sales must climb sharply or new money must come in. For now, time is on the company’s side.
Executives buying with their own money is usually read as confidence in the company’s future.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly above the class average — a step short of the very top.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Price Momentum: The stock has lagged the market in recent months; investor interest is weak right now.
Business Quality: Profit power and business quality trail similar companies in the sector.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 85% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
Sales run at $18.1M a year. A small number, but proof the product has real buyers.
There is $5.7M in the vault; even if every debt were paid off, $4.6M would remain.
Over the last 12 months, company executives reported 6 buys and 3 sells. Management buying with its own money is usually read as a good sign.
A loss of $948K against $18.1M in annual sales. And on top of that, sales fell from the year before.
The stock sits at $0.54. Under exchange rules, stocks that stay below $1 for too long risk being removed from the market.
On our five-subject report card, MITQ sits behind the class. A low grade doesn’t mean “doomed” — it means “big claim, small proof.”
The takeaway: MITQ is a high-risk stock — not yet profitable, and its future rides on its product catching on.
The total grade weighs these five subjects against the sector — it isn’t a simple average of the five.