Designs and manufactures airframe and engine structures for the aerospace industry. Provides electrical interconnection systems for civil airframe and defense platforms. Now — the numbers.
The company closed last year at a loss: costs ran above sales. The picture changes only if spending is reined in.
An average decline of 16% a year over the last 4 years — the most striking risk in this picture. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
Before the clock runs out, either sales must climb sharply or new money must come in. This is the most critical line in the whole picture.
This company is not turning a profit, so the market is pricing its sales instead: 0.4× for every dollar of annual revenue.
No analyst target is on record for this company.
angles, checked one by one.
The 2 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
Revenue Growth: Sales are going backwards, not just slowing.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 84% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
The company sells $4.7B a year; the problem isn’t sales — it’s costs running above that number.
It pays out $0.11 per share each year — regular cash for whoever holds the stock.
A loss of $66.3M against $4.7B in annual sales.
At the current pace of spending, the cash lasts about 1.8 years. After that, the company needs to find new money.
We don’t have a report card for this stock yet — the data isn’t mature enough to grade. No grade is information too: it means the evidence is thin.
One-line summary: few numbers, an untested story. Keep watching.
Not covered, because the filings we hold do not carry it: earnings execution, the revenue breakdown.