Develops and publishes multi-platform racing video games. Offers games for consoles, PCs, and mobile platforms. Now — the numbers.
That much dependence is a risk in itself: if this one line weakens, the whole company feels it directly.
This is an established company with proven profits.
The market pays 3.9× for every dollar of annual profit — cheap, which is either an opportunity or a warning.
Against companies in its own sector, it looks cheaper than 95% of them.
No analyst target is on record for this company.
Executives buying with their own money is usually read as confidence in the company’s future.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Profit power and business quality lead the class.
Clearly below the class average.
The price looks reasonable next to what the company earns.
Clearly below the class average.
The stock has been running stronger than the market lately.
Financial Strength: The cash-and-debt balance is thin; the buffer for hard times is slim.
Growth: Sales growth trails the sector average.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 97% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
The net profit margin is 61% — that slice of every sale is the company’s cushion in hard quarters.
There is $5.0M in the vault; even if every debt were paid off, $5.0M would remain.
Over the last 12 months, company executives reported 32 buys and 14 sells. Management buying with its own money is usually read as a good sign.
Over the last 4 years, sales fell about 7% a year on average. Profit is holding up, but a shrinking business is a risk worth watching.
The balance sheet offers little cushion against a rough stretch. Report-card grade: 32/100.
The growth engine is running at low revs right now. Report-card grade: 43/100.
On our five-subject report card, MSGM sits behind the class. A low grade doesn’t mean “doomed” — it means “big claim, small proof.”
The takeaway: MSGM does earn real profits — but on our report card it still sits behind its class. The real debate isn’t the quality of the business — it’s what that quality should cost.
The total grade weighs these five subjects against the sector — it isn’t a simple average of the five.