On the stock market since 1994, it operates in the world of technology. It has 21 employees. Now — the numbers.
The company closed last year at a loss: costs ran above sales. The picture changes only if spending is reined in.
That much dependence is a risk in itself: if this one line weakens, the whole company feels it directly.
Before the clock runs out, either sales must climb sharply or new money must come in. For now, time is on the company’s side.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly above the class average — a step short of the very top.
The price isn’t cheap next to earnings — that’s why this grade sits in the middle.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Business Quality: Profit power and business quality trail similar companies in the sector.
Growth: Sales growth trails the sector average.
angles, checked one by one.
The 3 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
Profit per Sale: Right now the product sells for less than it costs to make; every sale deepens the loss.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 73% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
There is $12.3M in the vault; even if every debt were paid off, $12.0M would remain.
It pays out $0.70 per share each year — regular cash for whoever holds the stock.
A loss of $4.3M against $6.3M in annual sales. And on top of that, sales fell from the year before.
The stock sits at $0.38. Under exchange rules, stocks that stay below $1 for too long risk being removed from the market.
On our five-subject report card, MSN sits behind the class. A low grade doesn’t mean “doomed” — it means “big claim, small proof.”
The takeaway: MSN is a small company that closed last year at a loss. The road back to profit runs through spending discipline.
The total grade weighs these five subjects against the sector — it isn’t a simple average of the five.