On the stock market since 2024, it operates in the world of money and finance. It has 4 employees. Now — the numbers.
This is an established company with proven profits.
Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
The market pays 61.4× for every dollar this company earns in a year — a price that already assumes things go well.
Against companies in its own sector, it looks cheaper than 28% of them.
No analyst target is on record for this company.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Clearly below the class average.
For a bank, strength is measured by capital buffers and reserves — not cash minus debt.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
The stock has been running stronger than the market lately.
Financial Strength: The capital buffer looks thin next to its class; less room to absorb a rough stretch.
Business Quality: Profit power and business quality trail similar companies in the sector.
The stock trades near its peak today. For long-term holders the ride has paid off so far — though past performance guarantees nothing about the future.
Our checks did not surface a specific strength to highlight here.
The balance sheet offers little cushion against a rough stretch. Report-card grade: 12/100.
Measured against its sector, the quality of the business sits below the class average. Report-card grade: 28/100.
Today’s price already includes part of tomorrow’s optimism. Report-card grade: 28/100.
On our five-subject report card, NOEMU sits behind the class. A low grade doesn’t mean “doomed” — it means “big claim, small proof.”
The takeaway: NOEMU is an established business that has proven its profits for years. The real debate isn’t the quality of the business — it’s whether the price paid for the stock is too high.
The total grade weighs these five subjects against the sector — it isn’t a simple average of the five.
Not covered, because the filings we hold do not carry it: earnings execution, the revenue breakdown.