On the stock market since 1999, it operates in the world of energy. It has 12 employees. Now — the numbers.
The company is still in the product-building phase: its spending runs above its sales. That only changes once the product starts selling at scale.
Average growth of 51% a year over the last 4 years. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
Before the clock runs out, either sales must climb sharply or new money must come in. This is the most critical line in the whole picture.
Executives buying with their own money is usually read as confidence in the company’s future.
angles, checked one by one.
The 5 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
R&D Investment: Spending on future research is low.
The stock trades 56% below its peak. The market has trimmed its expectations for the company.
Sales run at $16.4M a year. A small number, but proof the product has real buyers.
There is $3.9M in the vault; even if every debt were paid off, $1.8M would remain.
Over the last 12 months, company executives reported 18 buys and 2 sells. Management buying with its own money is usually read as a good sign.
A loss of $2.3M against $16.4M in annual sales.
The stock sits at $0.29. Under exchange rules, stocks that stay below $1 for too long risk being removed from the market.
At the current pace of spending, the cash lasts about 1.7 years. After that, the company needs to find new money.
On our five-subject report card, NSFDF sits behind the class. A low grade doesn’t mean “doomed” — it means “big claim, small proof.”
The takeaway: NSFDF is a high-risk stock — not yet profitable, and its future rides on its product catching on.