On the stock market since 1994, it operates in the world of real estate. It has 544 employees. Now — the numbers.
This is an established company with proven profits.
Average growth of 29% a year over the last 4 years. Every year shown ended in profit.
The gap is $32.4B. In times of high interest rates, a gap like that can squeeze a company.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Profit indicators sit around the sector average.
A solid grade overall — yet the debt outweighs the cash. The strength here comes from earnings power.
The price isn’t cheap next to earnings — that’s why this grade sits in the middle.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Growth: Sales growth trails the sector average.
Price Momentum: The stock has lagged the market in recent months; investor interest is weak right now.
angles, checked one by one.
The 4 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
Executive Buying: The trades send no strong signal of confidence.
The stock trades 16% below its peak. The market has trimmed its expectations for the company.
The net profit margin is 18% — still a thick cushion, though costs have been eating into it lately.
Over the last 3 years, sales grew about 20% a year on average.
It pays out $3.24 per share each year — regular cash for whoever holds the stock.
The company’s market value is 58 times its annual profit. Even a small disappointment could hit the price hard.
The growth engine is running at low revs right now. Report-card grade: 49/100.
Buyers haven’t stepped back in yet; the price hasn’t found its footing. Report-card grade: 49/100. For a turnaround signal, the stock first needs to close the gap with the market.
On our five-subject report card, O sits in the middle of the class: some subjects shine, others don’t. The grade moves as the numbers move.
The takeaway: O is an established business that has proven its profits for years. The real debate isn’t the quality of the business — it’s what that quality should cost.