Designs and develops enterprise solutions globally. Offers advanced computing solutions for core and cloud environments. Now — the numbers.
That much dependence is a risk in itself: if this one line weakens, the whole company feels it directly.
This is an established company with proven profits.
Average growth of 7% a year over the last 4 years. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
The gap is $279.3M. In times of high interest rates, a gap like that can squeeze a company.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Profit indicators sit around the sector average.
Clearly below the class average.
The price isn’t cheap next to earnings — that’s why this grade sits in the middle.
This grade is a blend: the profit side is strong, the sales tempo slow.
The stock has been running stronger than the market lately.
Financial Strength: The cash-and-debt balance is thin; the buffer for hard times is slim.
The stock trades 40% below its peak. The market has trimmed its expectations for the company.
It met or beat analyst expectations in 7 of the last 8 quarters — consistency is a promise kept.
This stock swings about 2.9 times as much as the market average. Big rallies — and big drops — can both happen fast.
The company’s market value is 115 times its annual profit. Even a small disappointment could hit the price hard.
Over the last 12 months, executives reported 56 sells against just 14 buys. Not an alarm bell by itself, but a number worth watching.
On our five-subject report card, PENG sits behind the class. A low grade doesn’t mean “doomed” — it means “big claim, small proof.”
The takeaway: PENG does earn real profits — but on our report card it still sits behind its class. The real debate isn’t the quality of the business — it’s what that quality should cost.
The total grade weighs these five subjects against the sector — it isn’t a simple average of the five.
Analysts’ average target sits above today’s price, yet the valuation grade (54/100) says the stock isn’t cheap.