On the stock market since 2015, it operates in the world of energy. It has 9,059 employees. Now — the numbers.
This is an established company with proven profits.
Average growth of 16% a year over the last 4 years. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
The gap is $13.6B. In times of high interest rates, a gap like that can squeeze a company.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Sales are growing strongly for its sector.
Clearly below the class average.
Financial Strength: The cash-and-debt balance is thin; the buffer for hard times is slim.
Price Momentum: The stock has lagged the market in recent months; investor interest is weak right now.
angles, checked one by one.
The 2 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
Executive Buying: The trades send no strong signal of confidence.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 84% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
The net profit margin is 15% — still a thick cushion, though costs have been eating into it lately.
Over the last 3 years, sales grew about 8% a year on average.
It met or beat analyst expectations in 7 of the last 8 quarters — consistency is a promise kept.
This stock swings about 2.4 times as much as the market average. Big rallies — and big drops — can both happen fast.
The balance sheet offers little cushion against a rough stretch. Report-card grade: 2/100.
Buyers haven’t stepped back in yet; the price hasn’t found its footing. Report-card grade: 5/100. For a turnaround signal, the stock first needs to close the gap with the market.
On our five-subject report card, RUN sits behind the class. A low grade doesn’t mean “doomed” — it means “big claim, small proof.”
The takeaway: RUN is an established business that has proven its profits for years. The real debate isn’t the quality of the business — it’s whether the price paid for the stock is too high.
Analysts’ average target sits above today’s price, yet the valuation grade (22/100) says the stock isn’t cheap.