Designs, develops, produces, and markets propulsion and mechanical power transmission systems for aircraft, helicopters, and drones. Now — the numbers.
This is an established company with proven profits.
Average growth of 20% a year over the last 4 years. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
The market pays 18.9× for every dollar of annual profit — around what a business like this usually costs.
No analyst target is on record for this company.
angles, checked one by one.
The 2 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
The stock trades below its recent peak — about 9% off the top. A pullback, not a collapse.
The net profit margin is 23% — still a thick cushion, though costs have been eating into it lately.
Over the last 4 years, sales grew about 20% a year on average.
There is $7.9B in the vault; even if every debt were paid off, $1.7B would remain.
The price action doesn’t yet back an upward turn. Council score: 0/10.
Against everything we grade, SAFRF lands near the bottom. A low grade doesn’t mean “doomed” — it means “big claim, small proof.”
The takeaway: SAFRF does earn real profits — but on our report card it still sits behind its class. The real debate isn’t the quality of the business — it’s whether the price paid for the stock is too high.
Not covered, because the filings we hold do not carry it: the revenue breakdown.