On the stock market since 1994, it operates in the world of technology. It has 2,750 employees. Now — the numbers.
The company closed last year at a loss: costs ran above sales. The picture changes only if spending is reined in.
That much dependence is a risk in itself: if this one line weakens, the whole company feels it directly.
No real growth (2% a year). Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
Executives buying with their own money is usually read as confidence in the company’s future.
angles, checked one by one.
The 3 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
Revenue Growth: Sales are growing slowly.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 80% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
Over the last 12 months, company executives reported 20 buys and 7 sells. Management buying with its own money is usually read as a good sign.
A loss of $10.3M against $304.7M in annual sales. And on top of that, sales fell from the year before.
Since the drop from its peak, buyer appetite hasn’t come back. Council score: 0/10.
The sales tempo runs behind the sector. Council score: 2/10.
On our five-subject report card, SGMA sits behind the class. A low grade doesn’t mean “doomed” — it means “big claim, small proof.”
The takeaway: SGMA is a small company that closed last year at a loss. The road back to profit runs through spending discipline.