Identifies protein biomarkers using proprietary technology. Develops clinical diagnostic solutions for various diseases. Now — the numbers.
The biggest line carries real weight, but it doesn’t decide everything on its own.
The company is still in the product-building phase: its spending runs far above its sales. That only changes once the product starts selling at scale.
Average growth of 45% a year over the last 3 years. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
At this burn rate the cash pile isn’t the pressing question — for now, time is on the company’s side.
angles, checked one by one.
The 4 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
Cost Efficiency: As sales grow, profit fails to keep the same pace.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 85% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
Over the last 3 years, sales grew about 45% a year on average.
Sales run at $97.7M a year. A small number, but proof the product has real buyers.
There is $539.6M in the vault; even if every debt were paid off, $537.1M would remain.
A loss of $109.2M against $97.7M in annual sales.
Since the drop from its peak, buyer appetite hasn’t come back. Council score: 0/10.
Costs swallow the gains that sales growth brings in. Council score: 4/10.
We don’t have a report card for this stock yet — the data isn’t mature enough to grade. No grade is information too: it means the evidence is thin.
One-line summary: few numbers, an untested story. Keep watching.