On the stock market since 2010, it operates in the world of real estate. It has 47 employees. Now — the numbers.
This is an established company with proven profits.
Average growth of 21% a year over the last 4 years. Every year shown ended in profit.
The gap is $918.3M. In times of high interest rates, a gap like that can squeeze a company.
Executives buying with their own money is usually read as confidence in the company’s future.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Profit power and business quality lead the class.
A solid grade overall — yet the debt outweighs the cash. The strength here comes from earnings power.
Clearly below the class average.
Sales are growing strongly for its sector.
The price is looking for direction — no strong breakout, no collapse.
Valuation: The stock trades at a price that looks expensive next to its earnings; that can cap future returns.
The stock trades 20% below its peak. The market has trimmed its expectations for the company.
The net profit margin is 85% — still a thick cushion, though costs have been eating into it lately.
Over the last 3 years, sales grew about 20% a year on average.
It met or beat analyst expectations in 7 of the last 8 quarters — consistency is a promise kept.
Today’s price already includes part of tomorrow’s optimism. Report-card grade: 40/100.
Since the drop from its peak, buyer appetite hasn’t come back.
On our five-subject report card, TRNO sits near the top of the class. A high grade doesn’t mean “guaranteed win” — it means “the evidence looks strong for now.”
The takeaway: TRNO is an established business that has proven its profits for years. The real debate isn’t the quality of the business — it’s whether the price paid for the stock is too high.
The total grade weighs these five subjects against the sector — it isn’t a simple average of the five.