On the stock market since 2009, it operates in the world of real estate. It has 486 employees. Now — the numbers.
The company closed last year at a loss: costs ran above sales. The picture changes only if spending is reined in.
Average growth of 264% a year over the last 4 years. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
Before the clock runs out, either sales must climb sharply or new money must come in. This is the most critical line in the whole picture.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Clearly below the class average.
For a bank, strength is measured by capital buffers and reserves — not cash minus debt.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
The price is looking for direction — no strong breakout, no collapse.
Financial Strength: The capital buffer looks thin next to its class; less room to absorb a rough stretch.
Valuation: The stock trades at a price that looks expensive next to its earnings; that can cap future returns.
angles, checked one by one.
The 2 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
Cost Efficiency: As sales grow, profit fails to keep the same pace.
The stock trades 55% below its peak. The market has trimmed its expectations for the company.
It pays out $1.36 per share each year — regular cash for whoever holds the stock.
A loss of $454.3M against $605.6M in annual sales. And on top of that, sales fell from the year before.
At the current pace of spending, the cash lasts about 1.9 years. After that, the company needs to find new money.
On our five-subject report card, TWO sits behind the class. A low grade doesn’t mean “doomed” — it means “big claim, small proof.”
The takeaway: TWO has solid sales but closed last year at a loss. The road back to profit runs through spending discipline.