Creates and operates an interactive real-time 3D content platform. Provides software solutions for creating interactive 2D and 3D content. Now — the numbers.
That much dependence is a risk in itself: if this one line weakens, the whole company feels it directly.
The company closed last year at a loss: costs ran above sales. The picture changes only if spending is reined in.
Average growth of 14% a year over the last 4 years. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
At this burn rate the cash pile isn’t the pressing question — for now, time is on the company’s side.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
Clearly below the class average.
The stock has been running stronger than the market lately.
Financial Strength: The cash-and-debt balance is thin; the buffer for hard times is slim.
Business Quality: Profit power and business quality trail similar companies in the sector.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 79% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
Over the last 4 years, sales grew about 14% a year on average.
The company sells $1.8B a year; the problem isn’t sales — it’s costs running above that number.
A loss of $402.8M against $1.8B in annual sales.
This stock swings about 2.1 times as much as the market average. Big rallies — and big drops — can both happen fast.
Over the last 12 months, executives reported 56 sells against just 17 buys. Not an alarm bell by itself, but a number worth watching.
On our five-subject report card, U sits behind the class. A low grade doesn’t mean “doomed” — it means “big claim, small proof.”
The takeaway: U has solid sales but closed last year at a loss. The road back to profit runs through spending discipline.
The total grade weighs these five subjects against the sector — it isn’t a simple average of the five.