Designs and manufactures a wide range of footwear, apparel, and accessories. Markets and distributes its products through wholesale, retail, and e-commerce channels. Now — the numbers.
That much dependence is a risk in itself: if this one line weakens, the whole company feels it directly.
This is an established company with proven profits.
An average decline of 6% a year over the last 4 years — the most striking risk in this picture. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
The gap is $555.7M. In times of high interest rates, a gap like that can squeeze a company.
The market pays 17.1× for every dollar of annual profit — around what a business like this usually costs.
Against companies in its own sector, it looks cheaper than 67% of them.
Analysts' average target sits 27% above today's price.
The stock trades 47% below its peak. The market has trimmed its expectations for the company.
It met or beat analyst expectations in 8 of the last 8 quarters — consistency is a promise kept.
Over the last 12 months, company executives reported 57 buys and 46 sells. Management buying with its own money is usually read as a good sign.
It pays out $0.40 per share each year — regular cash for whoever holds the stock.
Over the last 4 years, sales fell about 6% a year on average. Profit is holding up, but a shrinking business is a risk worth watching.
Since the drop from its peak, buyer appetite hasn’t come back.
On our five-subject report card, WWW sits near the top of the class. A high grade doesn’t mean “guaranteed win” — it means “the evidence looks strong for now.”
The takeaway: WWW is an established business that has proven its profits for years. The real debate isn’t the quality of the business — it’s what that quality should cost.