Designs, develops, manufactures, and markets smart electric vehicles (EVs). Offers SUVs under the G3 and G3i names, targeting the smart urban utility segment. Now — the numbers.
That much dependence is a risk in itself: if this one line weakens, the whole company feels it directly.
The company closed last year at a loss: costs ran above sales. The picture changes only if spending is reined in.
Average growth of 37% a year over the last 4 years. Red columns mark years that ended in a loss.
At this burn rate the cash pile isn’t the pressing question — for now, time is on the company’s side.
This company is not turning a profit, so the market is pricing its sales instead: 0.9× for every dollar of annual revenue.
Against companies in its own sector, it looks cheaper than 28% of them.
Analysts' average target sits 67% above today's price.
Buys and sells are dead even — no clear signal either way.
An investor who bought at the very peak is down 81% today. The business is the same; what changed most is the price — and the expectations — the market pins on it.
Over the last 4 years, sales grew about 37% a year on average.
The company sells $11.1B a year; the problem isn’t sales — it’s costs running above that number.
A loss of $165.5M against $11.1B in annual sales.
The balance sheet offers little cushion against a rough stretch. Report-card grade: 15/100.
Buyers haven’t stepped back in yet; the price hasn’t found its footing. Report-card grade: 16/100. For a turnaround signal, the stock first needs to close the gap with the market.
On our five-subject report card, XPEV sits behind the class. A low grade doesn’t mean “doomed” — it means “big claim, small proof.”
The takeaway: XPEV has solid sales but closed last year at a loss. The road back to profit runs through spending discipline.
The total grade weighs these five subjects against the sector — it isn’t a simple average of the five.
Analysts’ average target sits above today’s price, yet the valuation grade (28/100) says the stock isn’t cheap.