On the stock market since 2007, it operates in the everyday-essentials business. It has 81 employees. Now — the numbers.
This is an established company with proven profits.
Average growth of 31% a year over the last 4 years. Every year shown ended in profit.
The gap is $43.6M. In times of high interest rates, a gap like that can squeeze a company.
We compared this company with its own sector across five subjects.
A score of 50 means class average.
Clearly above the class average — a step short of the very top.
Clearly below the class average.
The price isn’t cheap next to earnings — that’s why this grade sits in the middle.
Clearly above the class average — a step short of the very top.
Clearly below the class average.
Price Momentum: The stock has lagged the market in recent months; investor interest is weak right now.
Financial Strength: The cash-and-debt balance is thin; the buffer for hard times is slim.
angles, checked one by one.
The 2 that stand out are on screen; the rest came back neutral.
The council scores out of 10; report-card grades are out of 100.
Executive Buying: The trades send no strong signal of confidence.
The stock trades 46% below its peak. The market has trimmed its expectations for the company.
Over the last 3 years, sales grew about 41% a year on average.
The average analyst price target is $30.50 — 173% above today’s price.
It pays out $12.50 per share each year — regular cash for whoever holds the stock.
Buyers haven’t stepped back in yet; the price hasn’t found its footing. Report-card grade: 39/100. For a turnaround signal, the stock first needs to close the gap with the market.
The balance sheet offers little cushion against a rough stretch. Report-card grade: 45/100.
No clear buy-side message is coming from the executive floor. Council score: 3/10.
On our five-subject report card, FTLF sits in the middle of the class: some subjects shine, others don’t. The grade moves as the numbers move.
The takeaway: FTLF is an established business that has proven its profits for years. The real debate isn’t the quality of the business — it’s what that quality should cost.
Analysts’ average target sits above today’s price, yet the valuation grade (58/100) says the stock isn’t cheap.