- Apple Inc (AAPL): 8.82%
- Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL): 8.21%
- Microsoft Corp (MSFT): 7.74%
- NVIDIA Corp (NVDA): 6.57%
- KLA Corp (KLAC): 4.98%
- Eli Lilly and Co (LLY): 4.86%
- Mastercard Inc Class A (MA): 4.47%
- Meta Platforms Inc Class A (META): 4.45%
- Waste Management Inc (WM): 4.34%
- Stryker Corp (SYK): 4.20%
JGRW ETF — Holdings & Analysis
JGRW focuses on a select group of 25 to 30 US companies that meet strong growth and quality fundamentals. 비용 비율 0.57%, $74M AUM, 10개 보유 종목, inception 2024.
Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) ETF — Price, Holdings & Analysis
JGRW focuses on a select group of 25 to 30 US companies that meet strong growth and quality fundamentals. 비용 비율 0.57%, $74M AUM, 10개 보유 종목, inception 2024.
ETF 개요
The aim is to find companies that demonstrate positive performance across a range of historical and future metrics relative to the US equity market. Growth stocks are those with above-average potential in revenue, earnings, and cash flow, evaluated over a five to ten-year period. While quality companies are those that have consistently achieved an ROE of 15% or more for at least ten consecutive years. Undervalued securities may be considered for investments. Positions are sold in the event of better opportunities arising or if a company no longer meets the funds criteria.
JGRW focuses on a select group of 25 to 30 US companies that meet strong growth and quality fundamentals. The aim is to find companies that demonstrate positive performance across a range of historical and future metrics relative to the US equity market. Growth stocks are those with above-average potential in revenue, earnings, and cash flow, evaluated over a five to ten-year period. Jensen Quality Growth ETF provides exposure to the equity market. The portfolio is concentrated with 10개 보유 종목.
위험 지표
Jensen Quality Growth ETF holds only 10 positions, creating elevated concentration risk where poor performance from a few holdings can significantly impact returns. A beta of 0.00 indicates lower volatility relative to the broader market. The 비용 비율 0.57% is above average and will reduce net returns over time.
운용보수율
0.57%
주요 보유 종목
배당수익률
0.00%
- State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) — 비용 비율 0.08%
- State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) — 비용 비율 0.08%
- State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) — 비용 비율 0.08%
- iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) — 비용 비율 0.19%
- iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) — 비용 비율 0.32%
- Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) — 비용 비율 0.18%
- State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) — 비용 비율 0.16%
- AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) — 비용 비율 1.71%
위험 지표
- 베타: 0.00
질문 및 답변
What is Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW)?
JGRW focuses on a select group of 25 to 30 US companies that meet strong growth and quality fundamentals. The aim is to find companies that demonstrate positive performance across a range of historical and future metrics relative to the US equity mar It holds 10 securities. With $74M in assets under management, it is a funds in its category.
What is the expense ratio for JGRW?
Jensen Quality Growth ETF has an expense ratio of 0.57%, which is considered moderate for equity ETFs. This means for every $10,000 invested, annual fees would be approximately $57. Lower expense ratios generally lead to better long-term returns, all else being equal.
What are the top holdings in JGRW?
The three largest positions in Jensen Quality Growth ETF are Apple Inc (AAPL, 8.8%), Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL, 8.2%), Microsoft Corp (MSFT, 7.7%). Together these top three holdings represent 24.8% of the fund, out of 10 total positions. The fund is relatively diversified across its holdings.
How long has JGRW been around?
Jensen Quality Growth ETF was launched in 2024, making it 2 years old. It is a relatively newer fund with a shorter track record. It is managed by Jensen.
What is the current NAV of JGRW?
Jensen Quality Growth ETF has a net asset value (NAV) of approximately $27.06 per share. The NAV represents the per-share value of the fund's underlying assets minus liabilities. Market price may differ slightly from NAV due to supply and demand dynamics during trading hours.