Falling launch costs, government missile-defense spending, and direct-to-device connectivity are turning space from a cost center into a recurring-revenue infrastructure layer.
The space economy reached roughly $613B in 2024 and is projected to nearly triple to $1.8 trillion by 2035, growing about twice as fast as global GDP, per WEF and McKinsey. Two forces are converging: reusable launch (Falcon 9 marginal cost near ~$30M per flight, Starship targeting sub-$100/kg) has collapsed the cost of orbital access, while governments are channeling record budgets into space-based defense. The result is capital rotating from speculative R&D into companies with real backlog, contracts, and the early stages of recurring service revenue.
Through 2026-2030, the addressable market crosses $1 trillion around 2032-2034, led by satellite broadband mega-constellations, direct-to-device cellular, and missile-tracking layers. Defense demand is a near-term anchor: the US Golden Dome initiative (estimated $175B+ over its first phase) and a Space Force budget approaching ~$26-40B are funding proliferated LEO sensor constellations. Connectivity scales from intermittent to continuous service as operators reach commercial activation, shifting the model from one-off hardware sales to subscription-like revenue.
The forces routing money into this theme right now.
The US Golden Dome initiative funds proliferated LEO missile-tracking constellations, with multi-hundred-million-dollar Space Development Agency awards already flowing to prime contractors (SpaceNews, Aerospace Center for Space Policy).
Satellite-to-smartphone networks moved from demos to commercial agreements with major carriers in 2025-2026, opening a direct-to-device segment forecast to grow ~14-15% annually (company filings; Coherent Market Insights).
Reusability cut per-kg launch cost by orders of magnitude versus the Shuttle era, structurally expanding what is economically viable to put in orbit (Thunder Said Energy; industry trackers).
FY2026 defense appropriations funded the Space Force near $26B and restored SDA Tranche 3, with combined reconciliation funding driving a near-40% increase that underpins multi-year contractor backlog (SpaceNews; Air & Space Forces Magazine).
Structural large-cap anchors — lower-variance exposure to the theme.
Rocket Lab is capitalizing on the shift towards recurring space infrastructure revenue with its Electron and Neutron launch vehicles, evidenced by a record backlog and expanding launch contracts. The company's ability to scale from small to medium-lift capabilities positions it as a key player in the evolving space economy.
Why the excitement: Rocket Lab's Q1 FY2026 earnings call highlighted a record $2 billion backlog, signaling strong demand for its launch services and space systems.
The honest risk: Rocket Lab's operating margin of -33.2% indicates that profitability remains a challenge despite revenue growth.
L3Harris is positioned as a direct beneficiary of the Golden Dome missile-defense program and increased Space Force spending, transitioning toward durable, repeatable revenue streams. The company's Q1 FY2026 results and backlog growth signal strong alignment with critical defense priorities.
Why the excitement: L3Harris's backlog has almost doubled to over $40 billion, with another $25 billion in Munitions Acceleration Council programs in negotiation, indicating substantial future revenue.
The honest risk: Increased investment in research and development, while strategically important, could offset margin expansion in the short term.
Lockheed Martin is central to the emerging space-defense architecture, particularly the Golden Dome missile-defense program, offering lower volatility exposure to high-growth space themes. Strong demand and a significant backlog underpin confidence in the company's full-year guidance for 2026.
Why the excitement: Lockheed Martin is ramping up production of key defense systems, such as Prism, to meet accelerated demand, signaling strong growth potential.
The honest risk: Lower volume at Aeronautics, primarily related to the life cycle on classified programs, could impact sales growth.
Smaller names with higher upside and deeper potential drawdowns.
AST SpaceMobile aims to connect ordinary phones directly to satellites, a high-risk, high-reward venture into ubiquitous global connectivity. With manufacturing scaling and government contracts expanding, ASTS is positioned to potentially disrupt the telecom landscape, though execution and capital needs remain critical.
Why the excitement: AST SpaceMobile secured over $1.2 billion in contracted revenue commitments from commercial partners, signaling strong market validation.
The honest risk: Negative gross margin of -27.0% highlights the challenges in achieving profitability.
Asymmetry: Large upside if direct-to-cell scales; deep drawdown if Starlink competes or launches slip.
Intuitive Machines aims to transition from episodic lunar deliveries to a recurring revenue model, leveraging its early CLPS missions and strategic acquisitions to establish a cislunar infrastructure. While speculative, the company's focus on government contracts and space data networks positions it as a potential beneficiary of increased space spending.
Why the excitement: Management projects 2026 revenue approaching $1 billion, nearly a 5x increase from 2025, driven by expanded capabilities and addressable market.
The honest risk: As a smaller, asymmetric name, Intuitive Machines faces execution risk in scaling its operations and achieving profitability in the competitive space sector.
Asymmetry: High upside on program wins; sharp drawdown on a single contract loss or mission failure.
Redwire is a focused picks-and-shovels bet on the burgeoning space infrastructure build-out, transitioning from components to prime contractor; recent contract wins validate its strategic shift up the value chain.
Why the excitement: Redwire's Q1 2026 earnings call highlighted a strong book-to-bill ratio of 1.92 and a record contracted backlog of $498.1 million, signaling robust future revenue.
The honest risk: Redwire's negative operating and net margins (-76.6% and -80.9%, respectively) highlight the risk of continued losses despite revenue growth.
Asymmetry: Upside on backlog conversion; drawdown risk given negative operating margin.
The sub-layers and the leaders that anchor each one.
It is the full value chain that builds, launches and operates in space — from components and launch to orbital infrastructure, satellites and defense. It is estimated near $610B today and projected toward $1.8T by 2035.
Launch is the toll booth of space. As the cost per kilogram falls from $65,000 toward $100-200, demand compounds across the entire chain, which is why falling launch cost is the foundational catalyst.
A multi-year, structural rise in space defense spending: the US Space Force budget reached $40.2B for 2026 and the Golden Dome missile shield carries $15.7B, a durable demand signal for primes and specialists.
A listing near a $1.5-2T valuation could re-price the entire sector and lift public peers and the SpaceX supply chain, though post-IPO pullbacks are common so it is both a catalyst and a risk.
No. This is an educational research tool, not investment advice. Conviction reflects research interest, not buy or sell recommendations, and data is sourced from FMP earnings calls and analyst estimates.
Defense Tech 2.0AI InfrastructureQuantum Computing
投資助言ではなく教育コンテンツ。過去のパフォーマンスは将来の結果を保証しません。