Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF (EAPR) Analysis
For informational purposes only. Not financial advice.
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF (EAPR) has a last stored price of $34.00, as of the Oct 2, 2026 trading session. It has a 0.89% expense ratio and $73M in assets under management.
In the stored portfolio snapshot, the largest sector allocation is Technology at 32.9%.
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF (EAPR) ETF — Price, Holdings & Analysis
ETF Overview
Risk Metrics
- Beta: 0.35
Expense Ratio
How Is the Fund Allocated?
| Sector | Weight |
|---|---|
| Technology | 32.9% |
| Financial Services | 20.8% |
| Consumer Cyclical | 10.6% |
| Communication Services | 7.7% |
| Basic Materials | 7.4% |
| Industrials | 7.2% |
| Energy | 3.8% |
| Consumer Defensive | 3.2% |
| Healthcare | 3.1% |
| Utilities | 2.0% |
| Real Estate | 1.3% |
| Country | Weight |
|---|---|
| Other | 100.0% |
Dividend Yield
- ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) — 0.75% expense ratio
- Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) — 0.18% expense ratio
- State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) — 0.16% expense ratio
- State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) — 0.08% expense ratio
- State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) — 0.08% expense ratio
- WisdomTree Emerging Markets ESG Fund (DVEM) — 0.32% expense ratio
- Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) — 0.59% expense ratio
- iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) — 0.32% expense ratio
- Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF (DDFN) (Equity) — 0.79% expense ratio
- Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF (BSEP) (Equity) — 0.79% expense ratio
- Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF (DDTN) (Equity) — 0.79% expense ratio
- Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF (UAUG) (Equity) — 0.79% expense ratio
- Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF (XBAP) (Equity) — 0.79% expense ratio
- Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (PSTP) (Equity) — 0.89% expense ratio
Questions & Answers
What is EAPR and what does it track?
The Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF (EAPR) is an equity ETF designed to provide exposure to emerging markets while offering a buffer against potential losses.
It seeks to track the performance of the iShares MSCI EM ETF (EEM), but with a twist. EAPR aims to buffer investors against the first 15% of losses over a one-year outcome period.
What is the expense ratio for EAPR?
The expense ratio for EAPR is 0.89%. This means that for every $10,000 invested, $89 is deducted annually to cover the fund's operating expenses.
When compared to the average expense ratio for equity ETFs, which is approximately 0.44%, EAPR's expense ratio is notably higher.
Is EAPR a good long-term investment?
EAPR's suitability as a long-term investment depends on an investor's individual risk tolerance and investment goals.
The ETF's defined outcome strategy, which buffers against the first 15% of losses, may appeal to risk-averse investors seeking to mitigate downside risk in emerging markets. However, the capped upside also limits potential gains in strongly performing markets.
How does EAPR compare to similar ETFs?
EAPR differentiates itself from traditional emerging market ETFs through its defined outcome strategy, offering a buffer against the first 15% of losses.
While many emerging market ETFs aim to replicate the returns of a broad market index, EAPR seeks to provide downside protection with a capped upside.
Does EAPR pay dividends?
According to the provided data, EAPR has a dividend yield of 0.00%. This indicates that the fund does not currently distribute dividends to its shareholders.
Investors seeking income from their investments may want to consider other emerging market ETFs that offer a dividend yield. However, EAPR's primary focus is on providing downside protection rather than generating income.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Always do your own research and consult a financial advisor.
Data provided for informational purposes only.
Written by machine, not reviewed page by page. Editorial oversight is systemic: the rules and the sources are checked, individual pages are not.