Skip to main content
Stock Expert AI

PSFF ETF Analysis

For informational purposes only. Not financial advice.

Quick Answer

PSFF ETF has a last stored price of $35.29, as of the Oct 2, 2026 trading session. Holdings and weights below are as of Mar 15, 2026.

In the stored portfolio snapshot, the largest listed holding is Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO) at 15.14%.

PSFF ETF — Price, Holdings & Analysis

ETF Overview

The top three holdings account for 42.5% of assets, indicating meaningful single-stock concentration.

Risk Metrics

PSFF, creating elevated concentration risk where poor performance from a few holdings can significantly impact returns. The top three holdings represent 42.5% of the portfolio, introducing concentration risk. A beta of 0.52 indicates lower volatility relative to the broader market.
  • Beta: 0.52

What does PSFF hold?

HoldingWeight
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO)15.14%
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (January) ETF (PSMD)14.09%
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ)13.24%
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR)12.49%
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW)9.15%
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (Oct) ETF (PSCQ)7.41%
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF (PSCJ)6.33%
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF (PSFD)5.68%
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF (PSFO)5.10%
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (Jan) ETF (PSCX)4.58%

This fund data is more than 45 days old; verify current holdings with the issuer.

Dividend Yield

0.00%

Questions & Answers

What are the top holdings in PSFF?

The three largest positions in PSFF are Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO, 15.1%), Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (January) ETF (PSMD, 14.1%), Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ, 13.2%).

Together these top three holdings represent 42.5% of the fund. The fund has a concentrated portfolio.

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Always do your own research and consult a financial advisor.

Data provided for informational purposes only.

Written by machine, not reviewed page by page. Editorial oversight is systemic: the rules and the sources are checked, individual pages are not.