iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) Holdings & Expense Ratio
For informational purposes only. Not financial advice.
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a last stored price of $103.96, as of the Oct 2, 2026 trading session. It has a 0.32% expense ratio and $77.7B in assets under management.
Holdings and weights below are as of Sep 21, 2026. In the stored portfolio snapshot, the largest listed holding is ASML HOLDING (ASML.AS) at 2.96%, and the largest sector allocation is Financial Services at 26.4%.
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) ETF — Price, Holdings & Analysis
ETF Overview
Risk Metrics
- Beta: 0.87
Expense Ratio
What does EFA hold?
| Holding | Weight |
|---|---|
| ASML HOLDING (ASML.AS) | 2.96% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC (HSBA.L) | 1.60% |
| ROCHE PS PAR AG (ROP.SW) | 1.40% |
| SHELL PLC (SHEL.L) | 1.26% |
| NOVARTIS AG (NOVN.SW) | 1.18% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC (AZN.L) | 1.16% |
| MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP (8306.T) | 1.13% |
| NESTLE SA (NESN.SW) | 1.10% |
| BHP GROUP LTD (BHP.AX) | 1.01% |
| SIEMENS N AG (SIE.DE) | 1.01% |
How Is the Fund Allocated?
| Sector | Weight |
|---|---|
| Financial Services | 26.4% |
| Industrials | 18.0% |
| Technology | 11.8% |
| Healthcare | 10.0% |
| Consumer Cyclical | 7.0% |
| Consumer Defensive | 6.4% |
| Basic Materials | 6.0% |
| Communication Services | 4.6% |
| Energy | 4.1% |
| Utilities | 3.5% |
| Real Estate | 1.5% |
| Cash & Others | 0.6% |
| Country | Weight |
|---|---|
| Japan | 24.4% |
| United Kingdom | 13.8% |
| Switzerland | 9.6% |
| Germany | 8.7% |
| France | 8.6% |
| Netherlands | 6.4% |
| Australia | 6.3% |
| Spain | 3.9% |
| Sweden | 3.4% |
| Italy | 3.2% |
Dividend Yield
- ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) — 0.75% expense ratio
- Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) — 0.18% expense ratio
- State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) — 0.16% expense ratio
- State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) — 0.08% expense ratio
- State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) — 0.08% expense ratio
- WisdomTree Emerging Markets ESG Fund (DVEM) — 0.32% expense ratio
- Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) — 0.59% expense ratio
- iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) — 0.72% expense ratio
- iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) (Fixed Income) — 0.49% expense ratio
- iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) (Fixed Income) — 0.15% expense ratio
- iShares MSCI UAE ETF (UAE) (Equity) — 0.59% expense ratio
- iShares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) (Equity) — 0.08% expense ratio
- iShares Securitized Income Active ETF (SECU) (Fixed Income) — 0.40% expense ratio
Questions & Answers
What is iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA)?
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) is an exchange-traded fund. In the stored fund data, it has its largest sector allocation in Financial Services (26.4%) and charges a 0.32% expense ratio.
What is the expense ratio for EFA?
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF has an expense ratio of 0.32%, which is considered moderate for equity ETFs. This means for every $10,000 invested, annual fees would be approximately $32.
Lower expense ratios generally lead to better long-term returns, all else being equal.
What are the top holdings in EFA?
The three largest positions in iShares MSCI EAFE ETF are ASML HOLDING (ASML.AS, 3.0%), HSBC HOLDINGS PLC (HSBA.L, 1.6%), ROCHE PS PAR AG (ROP.SW, 1.4%). Together these top three holdings represent 6.0% of the fund.
The fund is relatively diversified across its holdings.
What sectors does EFA invest in?
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF allocates across 12 sectors. The largest sector exposures are Financial Services (26.4%), Industrials (18.0%), Technology (11.8%). The sector allocation provides broad market exposure across multiple industries.
How long has EFA been around?
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF was launched in 2001, making it 25 years old. As one of the longer-running ETFs, it has an extensive performance track record through multiple market cycles.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Always do your own research and consult a financial advisor.
Data provided for informational purposes only.
Written by machine, not reviewed page by page. Editorial oversight is systemic: the rules and the sources are checked, individual pages are not.