KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology ETF (KEM)
For informational purposes only. Not financial advice.
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology ETF (KEM) has a 0.80% expense ratio and $50M in assets under management. Holdings and weights below are as of Mar 15, 2026.
In the stored portfolio snapshot, the largest listed holding is KraneShares MSCI Em Mkts ex CHN ETF (KEMX) at 59.08%, and the largest sector allocation is Financial Services at 27.4%.
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology ETF (KEM) ETF — Price, Holdings & Analysis
ETF Overview
Risk Metrics
- Beta: 0.00
Expense Ratio
What does KEM hold?
| Holding | Weight |
|---|---|
| KraneShares MSCI Em Mkts ex CHN ETF (KEMX) | 59.08% |
| KraneShares MSCI All China ETF (KALL) | 40.37% |
This fund data is more than 45 days old; verify current holdings with the issuer.
How Is the Fund Allocated?
| Sector | Weight |
|---|---|
| Financial Services | 27.4% |
| Technology | 19.6% |
| Consumer Cyclical | 13.1% |
| Communication Services | 9.4% |
| Consumer Defensive | 6.7% |
| Basic Materials | 6.4% |
| Industrials | 5.5% |
| Energy | 3.8% |
| Healthcare | 3.5% |
| Utilities | 3.0% |
| Real Estate | 1.6% |
| Country | Weight |
|---|---|
| United States | 99.4% |
| Other | 0.6% |
Dividend Yield
- iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (JKK) — 0.06% expense ratio
- ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) — 0.75% expense ratio
- Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) — 0.18% expense ratio
- State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) — 0.08% expense ratio
- WisdomTree Emerging Markets ESG Fund (DVEM) — 0.32% expense ratio
- Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) — 0.59% expense ratio
- State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) — 0.16% expense ratio
- State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) — 0.08% expense ratio
- KraneShares European Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KEUA) (Equity) — 0.87% expense ratio
- KraneShares Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AGIX) (Equity) — 0.99% expense ratio
- Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) (Equity) — 1.02% expense ratio
- KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) (Equity) — 0.59% expense ratio
- KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN) (Equity) — 0.51% expense ratio
- KraneShares China Alpha Index ETF (KCAI) (Equity) — 0.79% expense ratio
Questions & Answers
What is KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology ETF (KEM)?
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology ETF (KEM) is an exchange-traded fund. In the stored fund data, it holds 3 positions, has its largest sector allocation in Financial Services (27.4%) and charges a 0.80% expense ratio.
What is the expense ratio for KEM?
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology ETF has an expense ratio of 0.80%, which is considered higher than average for equity ETFs. This means for every $10,000 invested, annual fees would be approximately $80.
Lower expense ratios generally lead to better long-term returns, all else being equal.
What sectors does KEM invest in?
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology ETF allocates across 11 sectors. The largest sector exposures are Financial Services (27.4%), Technology (19.6%), Consumer Cyclical (13.1%). The sector allocation provides broad market exposure across multiple industries.
How long has KEM been around?
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology ETF was launched in 2017, making it 9 years old. It has several years of operating history for investors to evaluate.
What is the current NAV of KEM?
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology ETF has a net asset value (NAV) of approximately $23.26 per share. The NAV represents the per-share value of the fund's underlying assets minus liabilities.
Market price may differ slightly from NAV due to supply and demand dynamics during trading hours.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Always do your own research and consult a financial advisor.
Data provided for informational purposes only.
Written by machine, not reviewed page by page. Editorial oversight is systemic: the rules and the sources are checked, individual pages are not.