Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) Holdings
For informational purposes only. Not financial advice.
Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) has a 0.75% expense ratio and $55M in assets under management. Holdings and weights below are as of Mar 15, 2026.
In the stored portfolio snapshot, the largest listed holding is iShares US Large Cap Deep Bffr ETF $ Acc (USDB.AS) at 9.55%, and the largest sector allocation is Technology at 33.1%.
Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) ETF — Price, Holdings & Analysis
ETF Overview
Risk Metrics
- Beta: 0.87
Expense Ratio
What does RPHS hold?
| Holding | Weight |
|---|---|
| iShares US Large Cap Deep Bffr ETF $ Acc (USDB.AS) | 9.55% |
This fund data is more than 45 days old; verify current holdings with the issuer.
How Is the Fund Allocated?
| Sector | Weight |
|---|---|
| Technology | 33.1% |
| Financial Services | 12.3% |
| Communication Services | 10.7% |
| Consumer Cyclical | 10.1% |
| Healthcare | 9.8% |
| Industrials | 8.7% |
| Consumer Defensive | 5.4% |
| Energy | 3.5% |
| Utilities | 2.5% |
| Real Estate | 2.0% |
| Basic Materials | 1.9% |
| Country | Weight |
|---|---|
| United States | 115.0% |
| Netherlands | 3.6% |
| Canada | 3.6% |
| France | 0.8% |
Dividend Yield
- ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) — 0.75% expense ratio
- Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) — 0.18% expense ratio
- State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) — 0.16% expense ratio
- State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) — 0.08% expense ratio
- State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) — 0.08% expense ratio
- WisdomTree Emerging Markets ESG Fund (DVEM) — 0.32% expense ratio
- Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) — 0.59% expense ratio
- iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) — 0.32% expense ratio
Questions & Answers
What is RPHS and what does it track?
The Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) is an actively-managed ETF that aims to mirror the investment characteristics of the S&P 500 Price Index.
However, unlike a passive index fund, RPHS uses a combination of direct equity investments and equity market index derivatives to achieve its objective.
What is the expense ratio for RPHS?
The expense ratio for the Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) is 0.75%. This means that for every $10,000 invested in the fund, $75 is charged annually to cover operating expenses.
While this provides active management, it is higher than the average expense ratio for passively managed large-cap equity ETFs, which often fall below 0.10%.
What are the top holdings in RPHS?
As of 2026-03-15, the top holding in the Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) is iShares US Large Cap Deep Bffr ETF $ Acc (USDB.AS), comprising 9.55% of the fund's portfolio.
The fund has significant allocations to Technology (33.1%), Financial Services (12.3%), and Communication Services (10.7%).
Is RPHS a good long-term investment?
Whether RPHS is a suitable long-term investment depends on an individual's investment goals and risk tolerance. The fund's active management strategy aims to outperform the S&P 500, but this also introduces the risk of underperformance.
With an expense ratio of 0.75%, the fund is more expensive than passively managed index funds.
How does RPHS compare to similar ETFs?
RPHS differentiates itself from other S&P 500-focused ETFs through its active management strategy. While many ETFs passively track the index, RPHS's managers actively adjust the portfolio based on their market outlook.
This comes at a higher expense ratio of 0.75% compared to passive ETFs, which typically have expense ratios below 0.10%.
Does RPHS pay dividends?
According to the latest data, the Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF (RPHS) has a dividend yield of 0.00%. This indicates that the fund is not currently distributing any dividend income to its shareholders.
Investors seeking dividend income may want to consider other equity ETFs with a history of dividend payments. However, it's important to note that dividend yields can fluctuate over time based on market conditions and fund performance.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Always do your own research and consult a financial advisor.
Data provided for informational purposes only.
Written by machine, not reviewed page by page. Editorial oversight is systemic: the rules and the sources are checked, individual pages are not.