NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) Holdings
For informational purposes only. Not financial advice.
NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) has a last stored price of $46.63, as of the Oct 23, 2026 trading session. It has a 0.98% expense ratio and $33M in assets under management.
Holdings and weights below are as of Mar 15, 2026. In the stored portfolio snapshot, the largest listed holding is NVIDIA Corp (NVDA) at 8.36%.
NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) ETF — Price, Holdings & Analysis
ETF Overview
Risk Metrics
- Beta: 0.00
Expense Ratio
What does XQQI hold?
| Holding | Weight |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp (NVDA) | 8.36% |
| Apple Inc (AAPL) | 7.61% |
| Microsoft Corp (MSFT) | 5.67% |
| Amazon.com Inc (AMZN) | 4.37% |
| Tesla Inc (TSLA) | 3.90% |
| Meta Platforms Inc Class A (META) | 3.70% |
| Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL) | 3.53% |
| Walmart Inc (WMT) | 3.37% |
| Alphabet Inc Class C (GOOG) | 3.28% |
| Broadcom Inc (AVGO) | 2.94% |
This fund data is more than 45 days old; verify current holdings with the issuer.
How Is the Fund Allocated?
| Country | Weight |
|---|---|
| United States | 95.7% |
| Canada | 1.1% |
| Australia | 0.1% |
| Ireland | 0.9% |
| Netherlands | 1.1% |
| Uruguay | 0.5% |
| United Kingdom | 1.5% |
Dividend Yield
- iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (JKK) — 0.06% expense ratio
- ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) — 0.75% expense ratio
- Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) — 0.18% expense ratio
- State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) — 0.08% expense ratio
- WisdomTree Emerging Markets ESG Fund (DVEM) — 0.32% expense ratio
- Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) — 0.59% expense ratio
- State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) — 0.16% expense ratio
- State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) — 0.08% expense ratio
- NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) (Equity) — 0.75% expense ratio
- NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) (Equity) — 0.68% expense ratio
- NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) (Fixed Income) — 0.68% expense ratio
- NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) (Equity) — 0.68% expense ratio
- NEOS Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI) (Equity) — 2.89% expense ratio
- NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) (Commodity) — 0.78% expense ratio
Questions & Answers
What is NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI)?
NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) is an exchange-traded fund. In the stored fund data, it charges a 0.98% expense ratio.
What is the expense ratio for XQQI?
NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF has an expense ratio of 0.98%, which is considered higher than average for equity ETFs. This means for every $10,000 invested, annual fees would be approximately $98.
Lower expense ratios generally lead to better long-term returns, all else being equal.
What are the top holdings in XQQI?
The three largest positions in NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF are NVIDIA Corp (NVDA, 8.4%), Apple Inc (AAPL, 7.6%), Microsoft Corp (MSFT, 5.7%). Together these top three holdings represent 21.6% of the fund.
The fund is relatively diversified across its holdings.
What is the current NAV of XQQI?
NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF has a net asset value (NAV) of approximately $45.76 per share. The NAV represents the per-share value of the fund's underlying assets minus liabilities.
Market price may differ slightly from NAV due to supply and demand dynamics during trading hours.
Is XQQI a good investment?
NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF is a equity ETF with $33M in assets. Equity ETFs are subject to market risk and can experience significant short-term volatility, though they have historically provided strong long-term returns for patient investors.
Whether it is suitable depends on your investment goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. Consider consulting a financial advisor for personalized guidance.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Always do your own research and consult a financial advisor.
Data provided for informational purposes only.
Written by machine, not reviewed page by page. Editorial oversight is systemic: the rules and the sources are checked, individual pages are not.