Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) Holdings & Expense Ratio
For informational purposes only. Not financial advice.
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a last stored price of $67.50, as of the Oct 2, 2026 trading session. It has a 0.49% expense ratio and $18.2B in assets under management.
Holdings and weights below are as of Mar 15, 2026. In the stored portfolio snapshot, the largest listed holding is Newmont Corp (NEM) at 2.60%, and the largest sector allocation is Healthcare at 21.8%.
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) ETF — Price, Holdings & Analysis
ETF Overview
Risk Metrics
- Beta: 0.81
Expense Ratio
What does COWZ hold?
| Holding | Weight |
|---|---|
| Newmont Corp (NEM) | 2.60% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM) | 2.42% |
| Chevron Corp (CVX) | 2.30% |
| Merck & Co Inc (MRK) | 2.30% |
| Gilead Sciences Inc (GILD) | 2.27% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | 2.24% |
| Verizon Communications Inc (VZ) | 2.23% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co (BMY) | 2.21% |
| Altria Group Inc (MO) | 2.20% |
| Amgen Inc (AMGN) | 2.18% |
This fund data is more than 45 days old; verify current holdings with the issuer.
How Is the Fund Allocated?
| Sector | Weight |
|---|---|
| Healthcare | 21.8% |
| Energy | 16.9% |
| Technology | 16.5% |
| Consumer Cyclical | 11.7% |
| Consumer Defensive | 10.9% |
| Communication Services | 10.7% |
| Industrials | 7.6% |
| Basic Materials | 3.7% |
| Cash & Others | 0.2% |
| Country | Weight |
|---|---|
| United States | 95.9% |
| Ireland | 2.6% |
| United Kingdom | 0.5% |
| Singapore | 0.4% |
| Canada | 0.4% |
| Other | 0.2% |
Dividend Yield
- ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) — 0.75% expense ratio
- Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) — 0.18% expense ratio
- State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) — 0.16% expense ratio
- State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) — 0.08% expense ratio
- State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) — 0.08% expense ratio
- WisdomTree Emerging Markets ESG Fund (DVEM) — 0.32% expense ratio
- Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) — 0.59% expense ratio
- iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) — 0.32% expense ratio
- Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) (Equity) — 0.60% expense ratio
- Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) (Equity) — 0.65% expense ratio
- Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (EAFG) (Equity) — 0.65% expense ratio
- Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) (Equity) — 0.65% expense ratio
- Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) (Equity) — 0.49% expense ratio
- Pacer Industrial Real Estate ETF (INDS) (Equity) — 0.49% expense ratio
Questions & Answers
What is Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ)?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is an exchange-traded fund. In the stored fund data, it holds 103 positions, has its largest sector allocation in Healthcare (21.8%) and charges a 0.49% expense ratio.
What is the expense ratio for COWZ?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF has an expense ratio of 0.49%, which is considered moderate for equity ETFs. This means for every $10,000 invested, annual fees would be approximately $49.
Lower expense ratios generally lead to better long-term returns, all else being equal.
What are the top holdings in COWZ?
The three largest positions in Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF are Newmont Corp (NEM, 2.6%), Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM, 2.4%), Chevron Corp (CVX, 2.3%). Together these top three holdings represent 7.3% of the fund, out of 103 total positions.
The fund is relatively diversified across its holdings.
What sectors does COWZ invest in?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF allocates across 9 sectors. The largest sector exposures are Healthcare (21.8%), Energy (16.9%), Technology (16.5%). The sector allocation provides broad market exposure across multiple industries.
How long has COWZ been around?
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF was launched in 2016, making it 10 years old. With over a decade of history, it has navigated various market conditions.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Always do your own research and consult a financial advisor.
Data provided for informational purposes only.
Written by machine, not reviewed page by page. Editorial oversight is systemic: the rules and the sources are checked, individual pages are not.